Skip to content

chore(deps): lock file maintenance - #1150

Merged
vdusek merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
renovate/lock-file-maintenance
Oct 19, 2026
Merged

vdusek merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
renovate/lock-file-maintenance

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Oct 19, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the warning logs for more information.

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • Between 12:00 AM and 05:59 AM, only on Monday (* 0-5 * * 1)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. label Oct 19, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 19, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.53%. Comparing base (6e76310) to head (e6f10f5).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1150      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.53%   95.53%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          61       61              
  Lines        5975     5974       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         5708     5707       -1     
  Misses        267      267              
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 90.65% <66.66%> (-0.19%) ⬇️
unit 89.01% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

vdusek added a commit to apify/apify-docs that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2026
Aligns the Actor, version, env var and schedule request schemas with
what the API accepts, checked against apify-core and the live API.
`CreateActorRequest` gets `actorPermissionLevel` and
`CreateOrUpdateScheduleRequest` gets `notifications`, which now has its
own `ScheduleNotifications` schema. Fields drop `null` where the API
rejects it, or where a stored `null` breaks later requests. `versions`
needs at least one item.

`CreateOrUpdateVersionRequest` is split into `CreateVersionRequest`,
which requires `versionNumber` and `sourceType`, and
`UpdateVersionRequest`, where everything stays optional. Both take a new
`WritableVersionSourceType` enum without `SOURCE_CODE`, which the API
rejects. `EnvVarRequest` is now a standalone schema that requires `name`
and `value`. The previous `allOf` over `EnvVar` made the generated
client report an invalid override (apify/apify-client-python#1150).

Value patterns and length limits are left out on purpose:
apify-client-python turns them into local validation that would reject
input before the API sees it. apify/apify-client-python#1151 previews
the regenerated models. Until they're regenerated,
apify/apify-client-python#1144 adds the missing fields to the request
body by hand.

*✍️ Drafted by Claude Code*
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch from 62f8cf6 to 538025e Compare October 19, 2026 13:58
@vdusek
vdusek merged commit 304c8e9 into master Oct 19, 2026
34 checks passed
@vdusek
vdusek deleted the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch October 19, 2026 14:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants